The news about the Uber-Bolt safari war is buzzing. Bolt is stepping into the Kenyan safari market just like Uber. This sets the stage for a classic showdown with Uber.
We all know what that means. Price cuts. Promotions. Better deals for customers. It is a win for riders looking for an affordable trip to the Maasai Mara and other tourist sites.
But behind the scenes of this exciting price war is a less glamorous player. The Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) or the tax commissioner. For every shilling saved by a customer, there is a shilling earned by a driver and a company.
You can bet the tax commissioner is watching closely. The commissioner wants to know: how much is the tax share, who is delivering it and when. It is as simple as that.
So, what does this battle mean for taxes – to you as a taxpayer and to the tax commissioner? Here it is – but just a bit of it, not everything.
The ride-hailing drivers
The ride-hailing drivers at Uber and Bolt will get more trips, and that comes with more tax questions. Competition between the two companies will result in a price drop, no matter how small. Econ 101 – when prices drop, the hope is that demand volume increases (Econ 101 – demand, supply and prices).
A driver might earn less per trip. But they could complete many trips in a day (on safari? Maybe drop-offs). This directly affects their income tax.
a. More trips, more income
The high trip volume can push a driver into a new tax bracket. This sounds scary, but it means they are earning more income. The key is accurate record-keeping. Drivers must track all their earnings from both apps. According to the Income Tax Act, it is mandatory to declare all income earned.
b. Managing monthly tax obligations
The challenge is that many drivers operate as sole proprietors. The majority have fluctuating incomes from price wars. This makes managing monthly tax obligations tricky. The drivers need to set aside money for taxes from every trip. It is easy to get a high daily total and forget the tax commissioner’s cut.
c. Value Added Tax
Ride-hailing services are subject to the current 16% Value Added Tax (VAT). This tax is included in the fare you see on the app. The ride-hailing companies remit the VAT to the tax commissioner.
But the system’s efficiency relies on clean data from every transaction from the companies. More rides mean more data points for the tax commissioner to track.
Bolt and Uber Taxes
For the two ride-hailing companies, the bigger problem is the corporate tax complexities. The competition is not just for customers. It is for driver loyalty too. Both companies will invest heavily in incentives.
Think sign-up bonuses for new safari drivers and promotional discounts for riders. These expenses are crucial for the business’s survival. But they will reduce the overall corporate tax liability. Any company’s profit is revenue minus allowable expenses.
Spending millions on marketing and promotions lowers their taxable profits. A lower taxable profit means a lower corporate tax bill. This is standard business practice. But the tax commissioner will ensure these deductions are legitimate and within the law.
The international nature of these companies’ operations adds another layer. They earn revenue in Kenyan shillings, but their global reporting is in their tax residency currency, such as the US dollar. How do they account for this in their global financial statements?
Transfer pricing rules are critical here because of the inter-country nature of their transactions. The tax commissioner will want to ensure that profits are not artificially shifted to lower-tax countries. The price set for services between Uber Kenya and its parent company, for instance, will be a major point of interest.
For the Government
The Uber and Bolt safari operation issue is a balancing act. The government has a dual interest here. First, it is struggling to create a thriving digital economy.
Competition is good for innovation and consumer choice. Second, the government is struggling to raise adequate tax revenue to fund public services.
A price war that boosts the number of transactions is potentially a good thing. It widens the tax base. More economic activity means more VAT collection and more income tax from drivers.
However, if the competition becomes so fierce that drivers’ net incomes plummet, it could have the opposite effect. If drivers leave the platform, the tax base shrinks.
The government, through the tax commissioner, must walk a fine line. It must encourage business growth while ensuring tax compliance. The increased data from this sector makes it easier to spot discrepancies.
The Bottom Line for the Taxpayer
You might be looking for the cheapest safari deal. That is perfectly understandable. But being aware of the bigger picture is powerful. The price you pay is not just a battle between two tech giants. It is a transaction embedded in Kenya’s tax ecosystem.
Your ride contributes to VAT. It supports a driver’s livelihood, which is subject to income tax. It fuels a corporate entity that pays taxes. The next time you open your app to book a safari, remember this hidden financial flow. The real battle is not just on the road. It is on the balance sheet. Let us know your thoughts.
Read More Articles – HERE
For tax consultancy and investment advisory – HERE
